Article Explorer
Analysis of media coverage patterns, bias detection, and source verification. Each article is evaluated for accuracy, framing, and adherence to journalistic standards.
Filters
Oulet
2024-01-18
Outlet report significantly underreports casualty figures and relies primarily on Israeli military sources without independent verification.
Bias Analysis:
Underreporting
Hospital
Casualties
Verification
Campaign: Hospital Attacks
Outlet A
2024-01-15
Outlet A employs false equivalency between military casualties and civilian deaths, presenting disproportionate impacts as equal.
Bias Analysis:
Bothsidesism
False Equivalency
Casualties
Framing
Campaign: False Balance
Outlet B
2024-01-12
Outlet B frames military operations as defensive responses while omitting context about civilian infrastructure targeting.
Bias Analysis:
Context Omission
Framing
Context
Military
Campaign: Defensive Framing
Outlet C
2024-01-10
Comprehensive reporting on humanitarian impact with proper context and multiple source verification.
Bias Analysis:
Balanced
Humanitarian
Context
Verification
Campaign: Humanitarian Focus
Outlet D
2024-01-08
While attempting balance, article obscures clear patterns of disproportionate civilian targeting through excessive nuance.
Bias Analysis:
False Nuance
Nuance
Obfuscation
Patterns
Campaign: Complexity Framing
Outlet E
2024-01-05
Detailed legal analysis with expert sources clearly identifying violations of international humanitarian law.
Bias Analysis:
Factual
Legal
Expert Sources
International Law
Campaign: Legal Analysis